Research Article
Year 2018,
Volume: 21 Issue: 4, 327 - 334, 30.12.2018
Abstract
Objective: Aim of this study was to compare the plaque-reducing
effectiveness of powered and manual tooth brushing in a small group of
children.
Materials
and Methods: Ten children aged
between 7 to 10 years old were included the study. Each child firstly used
manual tooth brush (ORAL B Stages for children). After two weeks children were
asked to use powered tooth brush (ORAL-B TRIUMPH
5000 SMART GUIDE) for two weeks. Turesky
modification of the Quigley and Hein Plaque Index (TQHPI) and Approximal Plaque Index (API) scores
were recorded every two weeks. Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed rank test were
used for comparison the jaws and powered brush /manual brush. Significance at p
<0.05 were considered.
Results: The whole mouth TQHPI and API were significantly
different at after Powered Tooth brushing (p=0,005, p= 0,012). Statistics determined the most
significant relationship was
observed between baseline-post powered
brushing and between manual-powered brushing in both TQHPI and API values
(p=0.008**,p=0.005**,p=0.018*,p=0.012*).
Conclusion: Considering the results
of the pilot study; it shows that it is more effective in removing dental
plaque in both automatic and manual tooth brushing. Therefore, powered tooth brush can also be recommended
for children to increase the oral health.
Keywords
References
- 1. Garcia-Carrillo A, Jover A, Pla R, et al. Manual versus sonic powered toothbrushing in patients with intellectual disability: a cluster-randomised clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2016.2. Vibhute A, Vandana KL. The effectiveness of manual versus powered toothbrushes for plaque removal and gingival health: A meta-analysis. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012;16(2):156-160.3. Yousaf A. AN, Manzoor AM., Yasmin R. Comparison of Powered and Manual Toothbrushes in Removal of Plaque. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal. 2012;32(1):120-123.4. Aljafari A, Rice C, Gallagher JE, et al. An oral health education video game for high caries risk children: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:237.5. Re D, Augusti G, Battaglia D, et al. Is a new sonic toothbrush more effective in plaque removal than a manual toothbrush? Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015;16(1):13-18.6. Jain Y. A comparison of the efficacy of powered and manual toothbrushes in controlling plaque and gingivitis: a clinical study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2013;5:3-9.7. Goyal S, Thomas BS, Bhat KM, et al. Manual toothbrushing reinforced with audiovisual instruction versus powered toothbrushing among institutionalized mentally challenged subjects--a randomized cross-over clinical trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16(3):e359-364.8. Pine CM, McGoldrick PM, Burnside G, et al. An intervention programme to establish regular toothbrushing: understanding parents' beliefs and motivating children. Int Dent J. 2000;Suppl Creating A Successful:312-323.9. Gray-Burrows KA, Day PF, Marshman Z, et al. Using intervention mapping to develop a home-based parental-supervised toothbrushing intervention for young children. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):61.10. Cunha-Cruz J, Milgrom P, Shirtcliff RM, et al. "Everybody brush!": protocol for a parallel-group randomized controlled trial of a family-focused primary prevention program with distribution of oral hygiene products and education to increase frequency of toothbrushing. JMIR Res Protoc. 2015;4(2):e58.11. Ghassemi A, Vorwerk L, Hooper W, et al. Comparative plaque removal efficacy of a new children's powered toothbrush and a manual toothbrush. J Clin Dent. 2013;24(1):1-4.12. Mielczarek A. BT, Knopka T. An Assessment of the Effect of Manual and Electric Toothbrushes on Hard and Soft Oral Tissue. Dent Med Probl. 2013;50(4):472-475.13. Turesky S, Gilmore ND, Glickman I. Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of victamine C. J Periodontol. 1970;41(1):41-43.14. Quigley GA, Hein JW. Comparative cleansing efficiency of manual and power brushing. J Am Dent Assoc. 1962;65:26-29.15. Kallar S, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, et al. Plaque removal efficacy of powered and manual toothbrushes under supervised and unsupervised conditions: a comparative clinical study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011;29(3):235-238.16. Ferrazzano GF, Cantile T, Sangianantoni G, et al. Effectiveness of a motivation method on the oral hygiene of children. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2008;9(4):183-187.17. Heasman P. Power toothbrushes. Efficacy of a unique gum protection system with an interproximal tip. Introduction. J Clin Dent. 2001;12(1):1.18. Sheikh-Al-Eslamian SM. YN, Monir SES., Kadkhodazadeh M. Comparison of Manual and Electric Toothbrush in Dental Plaque Removal: Clinical Trial. Avicenna J Dent Res. 2014;6(1).19. Silverman J, Rosivack RG, Matheson PB, et al. Comparison of powered and manual toothbrushes for plaque removal by 4- to 5-year-old children. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26(3):225-230.20. Klukowska M, Grender JM, Goyal CR, et al. 8-week evaluation of anti-plaque and anti-gingivitis benefits of a unique multi-directional power toothbrush versus a sonic control toothbrush. Am J Dent. 2012;25 Spec No A(A):27A-32A.21. Sharma NC, Lyle DM, Qaqish JG, et al. Comparison of two power interdental cleaning devices on plaque removal. J Clin Dent. 2012;23(1):17-21.22. Sharma NC, Lyle DM, Qaqish JG, et al. Comparison of two power interdental cleaning devices on the reduction of gingivitis. J Clin Dent. 2012;23(1):22-26.23. Morris AJ, Steele J, White DA. The oral cleanliness and periodontal health of UK adults in 1998. Br Dent J. 2001;191(4):186-192.24. Sharma NC, Klukowska M, Mielczarek A, et al. A 4-week clinical comparison of a novel multi-directional power brush to a manual toothbrush in the reduction of gingivitis and plaque. Am J Dent. 2012;25 Spec No A(A):14A-20A.25. Lazarescu D, Boccaneala S, Illiescu A, et al. Efficacy of plaque removal and learning effect of a powered and a manual toothbrush. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30(8):726-731.26. Jongenelis AP, Wiedemann W. A comparison of plaque removal effectiveness of an electric versus a manual toothbrush in children. ASDC J Dent Child. 1997;64(3):176-182, 165.27. Baab DA, Johnson RH. The effect of a new electric toothbrush on supragingival plaque and gingivitis. J Periodontol. 1989;60(6):336-341.28. Preber H, Ylipaa V, Bergstrom J, et al. A comparative study of plaque removing efficiency using rotary electric and manual toothbrushes. Swed Dent J. 1991;15(5):229-234.29. Williams MI, Vazquez J, Cummins D. Clinical comparison of a new manual toothbrush on breath volatile sulfur compounds. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004;25(10 Suppl 2):22-27.30. Heasman PA, Stacey F, Heasman L, et al. A comparative study of the Philips HP 735, Braun/Oral B D7 and the Oral B 35 Advantage toothbrushes. J Clin Periodontol. 1999;26(2):85-90.31. Yaacob M, Worthington HV, Deacon SA, et al. Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(6):CD002281.32. Robinson PG, Deacon SA, Deery C, et al. Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005(2):CD002281.
Year 2018,
Volume: 21 Issue: 4, 327 - 334, 30.12.2018
Abstract
References
- 1. Garcia-Carrillo A, Jover A, Pla R, et al. Manual versus sonic powered toothbrushing in patients with intellectual disability: a cluster-randomised clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2016.2. Vibhute A, Vandana KL. The effectiveness of manual versus powered toothbrushes for plaque removal and gingival health: A meta-analysis. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012;16(2):156-160.3. Yousaf A. AN, Manzoor AM., Yasmin R. Comparison of Powered and Manual Toothbrushes in Removal of Plaque. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal. 2012;32(1):120-123.4. Aljafari A, Rice C, Gallagher JE, et al. An oral health education video game for high caries risk children: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:237.5. Re D, Augusti G, Battaglia D, et al. Is a new sonic toothbrush more effective in plaque removal than a manual toothbrush? Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015;16(1):13-18.6. Jain Y. A comparison of the efficacy of powered and manual toothbrushes in controlling plaque and gingivitis: a clinical study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2013;5:3-9.7. Goyal S, Thomas BS, Bhat KM, et al. Manual toothbrushing reinforced with audiovisual instruction versus powered toothbrushing among institutionalized mentally challenged subjects--a randomized cross-over clinical trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16(3):e359-364.8. Pine CM, McGoldrick PM, Burnside G, et al. An intervention programme to establish regular toothbrushing: understanding parents' beliefs and motivating children. Int Dent J. 2000;Suppl Creating A Successful:312-323.9. Gray-Burrows KA, Day PF, Marshman Z, et al. Using intervention mapping to develop a home-based parental-supervised toothbrushing intervention for young children. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):61.10. Cunha-Cruz J, Milgrom P, Shirtcliff RM, et al. "Everybody brush!": protocol for a parallel-group randomized controlled trial of a family-focused primary prevention program with distribution of oral hygiene products and education to increase frequency of toothbrushing. JMIR Res Protoc. 2015;4(2):e58.11. Ghassemi A, Vorwerk L, Hooper W, et al. Comparative plaque removal efficacy of a new children's powered toothbrush and a manual toothbrush. J Clin Dent. 2013;24(1):1-4.12. Mielczarek A. BT, Knopka T. An Assessment of the Effect of Manual and Electric Toothbrushes on Hard and Soft Oral Tissue. Dent Med Probl. 2013;50(4):472-475.13. Turesky S, Gilmore ND, Glickman I. Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of victamine C. J Periodontol. 1970;41(1):41-43.14. Quigley GA, Hein JW. Comparative cleansing efficiency of manual and power brushing. J Am Dent Assoc. 1962;65:26-29.15. Kallar S, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, et al. Plaque removal efficacy of powered and manual toothbrushes under supervised and unsupervised conditions: a comparative clinical study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011;29(3):235-238.16. Ferrazzano GF, Cantile T, Sangianantoni G, et al. Effectiveness of a motivation method on the oral hygiene of children. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2008;9(4):183-187.17. Heasman P. Power toothbrushes. Efficacy of a unique gum protection system with an interproximal tip. Introduction. J Clin Dent. 2001;12(1):1.18. Sheikh-Al-Eslamian SM. YN, Monir SES., Kadkhodazadeh M. Comparison of Manual and Electric Toothbrush in Dental Plaque Removal: Clinical Trial. Avicenna J Dent Res. 2014;6(1).19. Silverman J, Rosivack RG, Matheson PB, et al. Comparison of powered and manual toothbrushes for plaque removal by 4- to 5-year-old children. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26(3):225-230.20. Klukowska M, Grender JM, Goyal CR, et al. 8-week evaluation of anti-plaque and anti-gingivitis benefits of a unique multi-directional power toothbrush versus a sonic control toothbrush. Am J Dent. 2012;25 Spec No A(A):27A-32A.21. Sharma NC, Lyle DM, Qaqish JG, et al. Comparison of two power interdental cleaning devices on plaque removal. J Clin Dent. 2012;23(1):17-21.22. Sharma NC, Lyle DM, Qaqish JG, et al. Comparison of two power interdental cleaning devices on the reduction of gingivitis. J Clin Dent. 2012;23(1):22-26.23. Morris AJ, Steele J, White DA. The oral cleanliness and periodontal health of UK adults in 1998. Br Dent J. 2001;191(4):186-192.24. Sharma NC, Klukowska M, Mielczarek A, et al. A 4-week clinical comparison of a novel multi-directional power brush to a manual toothbrush in the reduction of gingivitis and plaque. Am J Dent. 2012;25 Spec No A(A):14A-20A.25. Lazarescu D, Boccaneala S, Illiescu A, et al. Efficacy of plaque removal and learning effect of a powered and a manual toothbrush. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30(8):726-731.26. Jongenelis AP, Wiedemann W. A comparison of plaque removal effectiveness of an electric versus a manual toothbrush in children. ASDC J Dent Child. 1997;64(3):176-182, 165.27. Baab DA, Johnson RH. The effect of a new electric toothbrush on supragingival plaque and gingivitis. J Periodontol. 1989;60(6):336-341.28. Preber H, Ylipaa V, Bergstrom J, et al. A comparative study of plaque removing efficiency using rotary electric and manual toothbrushes. Swed Dent J. 1991;15(5):229-234.29. Williams MI, Vazquez J, Cummins D. Clinical comparison of a new manual toothbrush on breath volatile sulfur compounds. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004;25(10 Suppl 2):22-27.30. Heasman PA, Stacey F, Heasman L, et al. A comparative study of the Philips HP 735, Braun/Oral B D7 and the Oral B 35 Advantage toothbrushes. J Clin Periodontol. 1999;26(2):85-90.31. Yaacob M, Worthington HV, Deacon SA, et al. Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(6):CD002281.32. Robinson PG, Deacon SA, Deery C, et al. Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005(2):CD002281.
There are 1 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
| Journal Section | Original Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 30, 2018 |
| Submission Date | November 8, 2018 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2018Volume: 21 Issue: 4 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.