Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF DENTINAL CRACKS CAUSED BY VARIOUS RECENT FILE SYSTEMS

Year 2022, Volume: 25 Issue: 2, 117 - 124, 30.06.2022
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1081617

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of present study was to evaluate the incidence of dentinal micro-cracks observed after the use of ProTaper Gold (PTG), WaveOne Gold (WOG), OneShape New Generation (OSNG), K3XF nickel-titanium (NiTi) instrumentation systems.
Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted human mandibular first molars were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 15). The root canals were instrumented with PTG, WOG, OSNG, and K3XF systems. The cross-sectional images of the roots were screened using high-resolution micro-computed tomography imaging before and after preparation to detect the presence of dentinal cracks.
Results: Although there was no statistically significant difference between PTG and WOG systems, WOG caused lesser micro-crack among all groups. K3XF showed statistically fewer cracks than OSNG. K3XF and OSNG systems caused statistically more dentinal micro-cracks than both Gold systems. WOG and PTG systems caused lesser micro-cracks formation among the systems evaluated in present study. Both Gold systems may be preferred as safer to minimize micro-cracks during root canal treatments.
Conclusions: All used systems have caused different degrees of crack formations. Furthermore, WOG and PTG systems have shown superior features in terms of creating dentinal cracks according to OSNG, and K3XF systems.

References

  • 1. Hübscher W, Barbakow F, Peters OA. Root‐canal preparation with FlexMaster: canal shapes analysed by micro‐computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2003;36:740-747.
  • 2. Ragul P, Dhanraj M, Jain AR. Irrigation technique used in cleaning and shaping during endodontic treatment-A review. Drug Invent Today. 2018;10:739-743.
  • 3. Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, Arslan H, Ertas ET. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. J Endod. 2014;40:852-856.
  • 4. Gao Y, Gutmann JL, Wilkinson K, Maxwell R, Ammon D. Evaluation of the impact of raw materials on the fatigue and mechanical properties of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments. J Endod. 2012;38:398-401.
  • 5. Keskin C, Inan U, Guler DH, Kalyoncuoğlu E. Cyclic fatigue resistance of XP-Endo Shaper, K3XF, and ProTaper Gold nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2018;44:1164-1167.
  • 6. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971;32:271-275.
  • 7. Liu R, Hou BX, Wesselink PR, Wu MK, Shemesh H. The incidence of root microcracks caused by 3 different single-file systems versus the ProTaper system. J Endod. 2013;39:1054-1056.
  • 8. Liu R, Kaiwar A, Shemesh H, Wesselink PR, Hou B, Wu MK. Incidence of apical root cracks and apical dentinal detachments after canal preparation with hand and rotary files at different instrumentation lengths. J Endod. 2013;39:129-132.
  • 9. Ashwinkumar V, Krithikadatta J, Surendran S, Velmurugan N. Effect of reciprocating file motion on microcrack formation in root canals: an SEM study. Int Endod J. 2014;47:622-627.
  • 10. Kim HC, Lee MH, Yum J, Versluis A, Lee CJ, Kim BM. Potential relationship between design of nickel-titanium rotary instruments and vertical root fracture. J Endod. 2010;36:1195-1199.
  • 11. Saber SEDM, El Sadat SMA. Effect of altering the reciprocation range on the fatigue life and the shaping ability of WaveOne nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2013;39:685-688.
  • 12. Abou El Nasr HM, Abd El Kader KG. Dentinal damage and fracture resistance of oval roots prepared with single-file systems using different kinematics. J Endod. 2014;40:849-851.
  • 13. Karataş E, Arslan H, Alsancak M, Kırıcı DÖ, Ersoy İ. Incidence of Dentinal Cracks after Root Canal Preparation with Twisted File Adaptive Instruments Using Different Kinematics. J Endod. 2015;41:1130-1133.
  • 14. Monga P, Bajaj N, Mahajan P, Garg S. Comparison of incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with continuous rotation and reciprocating instrumentation. Singap Dent J. 2015;36:29-33.
  • 15. Yoldas O, Yilmaz S, Atakan G, Kuden C, Kasan Z. Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file. J Endod. 2012;38:232-235.
  • 16. Thompson S. An overview of nickel–titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J. 2000;33:297-310.
  • 17. Gambarini G, Grande NM, Plotino G, Somma F, Garala M, De Luca M, et al. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods. J Endod. 2008;34:1003-1005.
  • 18. Ha JH, Kim SK, Cohenca N, Kim HC. Effect of R-phase heat treatment on torsional resistance and cyclic fatigue fracture. J Endod. 2013;39:389-393.
  • 19. Pereira E, Peixoto I, Viana A, Oliveira I, Gonzalez B, Buono V, et al. Physical and mechanical properties of a thermomechanically treated NiTi wire used in the manufacture of rotary endodontic instruments. Int Endod J. 2012;45:469-474.
  • 20. Peters OA, Morgental RD, Schulze K, Paqué F, Kopper PMP, Vier‐Pelisser FV. Determining cutting efficiency of nickel‐titanium coronal flaring instruments used in lateral action. Int Endod J. 2014;47:505-513.
  • 21. Hieawy A, Haapasalo M, Zhou H, Wang ZJ, Shen Y. Phase transformation behavior and resistance to bending and cyclic fatigue of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal instruments. J Endod. 2015;41:1134-1138.
  • 22. De Deus G, Belladonna FG, Souza EM, Silva EJNL, de Almeida Neves A, Alves H, et al. Micro–computed tomographic assessment on the effect of ProTaper Next and Twisted File Adaptive systems on dentinal cracks. J Endod. 2015;41:1116-1119.
  • 23. De Deus G, Marins J, de Almeida Neves A, Reis C, Fidel S, Versiani MA, et al. Assessing accumulated hard-tissue debris using micro–computed tomography and free software for image processing and analysis. J Endod. 2014;40:271-276.

ÇEŞİTLİ YENİ EĞE SİSTEMLERİNİN NEDEN OLDUĞU DENTİN ÇATLAKLARININ MİKRO BİLGİSAYARLI TOMOGRAFİK DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Year 2022, Volume: 25 Issue: 2, 117 - 124, 30.06.2022
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1081617

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, ProTaper Gold (PTG), WaveOne Gold (WOG), OneShape Yeni Nesil (OSNG), K3XF nikel-titanyum (NiTi) enstrümantasyon sistemlerinin kullanımından sonra gözlenen dentin mikro çatlaklarının insidansını değerlendirmektir. .
Gereç ve Yöntem: Altmış adet çekilmiş insan mandibular birinci molar dişi rastgele dört gruba ayrıldı (n = 15). Kök kanalları PTG, WOG, OSNG ve K3XF sistemleri ile enstrümante edildi. Köklerin kesit görüntüleri, dentin çatlaklarının varlığını tespit etmek için hazırlıktan önce ve sonra yüksek çözünürlüklü mikro bilgisayarlı tomografi görüntüleme kullanılarak tarandı.
Bulgular: PTG ve WOG sistemleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olmamasına rağmen, WOG tüm gruplar arasında daha az mikro-çatlamaya neden oldu. K3XF, OSNG'den istatistiksel olarak daha az çatlak gösterdi. K3XF ve OSNG sistemleri, her iki Gold sisteminden istatistiksel olarak daha fazla dentin mikro çatlaklarına neden oldu. WOG ve PTG sistemleri, bu çalışmada değerlendirilen sistemler arasında daha az mikro çatlak oluşumuna neden olmuştur. Kanal tedavileri sırasında mikro çatlakları en aza indirmek için her iki Gold sistemi de daha güvenli olarak tercih edilebilir.
Sonuçlar: Kullanılan tüm sistemler farklı derecelerde çatlak oluşumlarına neden olmuştur. Ayrıca WOG ve PTG sistemleri, OSNG ve K3XF sistemlerine göre dentin çatlakları oluşturma konusunda üstün özellikler göstermiştir.

References

  • 1. Hübscher W, Barbakow F, Peters OA. Root‐canal preparation with FlexMaster: canal shapes analysed by micro‐computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2003;36:740-747.
  • 2. Ragul P, Dhanraj M, Jain AR. Irrigation technique used in cleaning and shaping during endodontic treatment-A review. Drug Invent Today. 2018;10:739-743.
  • 3. Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, Arslan H, Ertas ET. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. J Endod. 2014;40:852-856.
  • 4. Gao Y, Gutmann JL, Wilkinson K, Maxwell R, Ammon D. Evaluation of the impact of raw materials on the fatigue and mechanical properties of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments. J Endod. 2012;38:398-401.
  • 5. Keskin C, Inan U, Guler DH, Kalyoncuoğlu E. Cyclic fatigue resistance of XP-Endo Shaper, K3XF, and ProTaper Gold nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2018;44:1164-1167.
  • 6. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971;32:271-275.
  • 7. Liu R, Hou BX, Wesselink PR, Wu MK, Shemesh H. The incidence of root microcracks caused by 3 different single-file systems versus the ProTaper system. J Endod. 2013;39:1054-1056.
  • 8. Liu R, Kaiwar A, Shemesh H, Wesselink PR, Hou B, Wu MK. Incidence of apical root cracks and apical dentinal detachments after canal preparation with hand and rotary files at different instrumentation lengths. J Endod. 2013;39:129-132.
  • 9. Ashwinkumar V, Krithikadatta J, Surendran S, Velmurugan N. Effect of reciprocating file motion on microcrack formation in root canals: an SEM study. Int Endod J. 2014;47:622-627.
  • 10. Kim HC, Lee MH, Yum J, Versluis A, Lee CJ, Kim BM. Potential relationship between design of nickel-titanium rotary instruments and vertical root fracture. J Endod. 2010;36:1195-1199.
  • 11. Saber SEDM, El Sadat SMA. Effect of altering the reciprocation range on the fatigue life and the shaping ability of WaveOne nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2013;39:685-688.
  • 12. Abou El Nasr HM, Abd El Kader KG. Dentinal damage and fracture resistance of oval roots prepared with single-file systems using different kinematics. J Endod. 2014;40:849-851.
  • 13. Karataş E, Arslan H, Alsancak M, Kırıcı DÖ, Ersoy İ. Incidence of Dentinal Cracks after Root Canal Preparation with Twisted File Adaptive Instruments Using Different Kinematics. J Endod. 2015;41:1130-1133.
  • 14. Monga P, Bajaj N, Mahajan P, Garg S. Comparison of incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with continuous rotation and reciprocating instrumentation. Singap Dent J. 2015;36:29-33.
  • 15. Yoldas O, Yilmaz S, Atakan G, Kuden C, Kasan Z. Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file. J Endod. 2012;38:232-235.
  • 16. Thompson S. An overview of nickel–titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J. 2000;33:297-310.
  • 17. Gambarini G, Grande NM, Plotino G, Somma F, Garala M, De Luca M, et al. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods. J Endod. 2008;34:1003-1005.
  • 18. Ha JH, Kim SK, Cohenca N, Kim HC. Effect of R-phase heat treatment on torsional resistance and cyclic fatigue fracture. J Endod. 2013;39:389-393.
  • 19. Pereira E, Peixoto I, Viana A, Oliveira I, Gonzalez B, Buono V, et al. Physical and mechanical properties of a thermomechanically treated NiTi wire used in the manufacture of rotary endodontic instruments. Int Endod J. 2012;45:469-474.
  • 20. Peters OA, Morgental RD, Schulze K, Paqué F, Kopper PMP, Vier‐Pelisser FV. Determining cutting efficiency of nickel‐titanium coronal flaring instruments used in lateral action. Int Endod J. 2014;47:505-513.
  • 21. Hieawy A, Haapasalo M, Zhou H, Wang ZJ, Shen Y. Phase transformation behavior and resistance to bending and cyclic fatigue of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal instruments. J Endod. 2015;41:1134-1138.
  • 22. De Deus G, Belladonna FG, Souza EM, Silva EJNL, de Almeida Neves A, Alves H, et al. Micro–computed tomographic assessment on the effect of ProTaper Next and Twisted File Adaptive systems on dentinal cracks. J Endod. 2015;41:1116-1119.
  • 23. De Deus G, Marins J, de Almeida Neves A, Reis C, Fidel S, Versiani MA, et al. Assessing accumulated hard-tissue debris using micro–computed tomography and free software for image processing and analysis. J Endod. 2014;40:271-276.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Recai Zan 0000-0002-2781-355X

Demet Altunbaş 0000-0002-7532-4785

İhsan Hubbezoğlu 0000-0001-8984-9286

Hüseyin Topçuoğlu 0000-0001-5944-9740

Gizem Kutlu Cengiz 0000-0002-7925-709X

Publication Date June 30, 2022
Submission Date March 2, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022Volume: 25 Issue: 2

Cite

EndNote Zan R, Altunbaş D, Hubbezoğlu İ, Topçuoğlu H, Kutlu Cengiz G (June 1, 2022) MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF DENTINAL CRACKS CAUSED BY VARIOUS RECENT FILE SYSTEMS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25 2 117–124.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.