Review
BibTex RIS Cite

COMPARISON OF SELF-ETCH AND CONVENTIONAL ACID-ETCH TECHNIQUES IN ORTHODONTIC BONDING PROCESS

Year 2014, Volume: 24 Issue: 3, 452 - 457, 11.02.2015

Ezgi Atik Semra Ciğer

https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.88039
Cited By: 1

Abstract

In recent years, new adhesive methods have been replaced with conventional bonding methods which are used for bonding orthodontic attachments, protecting teeth and saving time. Therefore; with the developing of the bonding procedures, new selfetching primers have been introduced. The advantages of the self-etching primers are; shorten application time due to not including acid-etching and washing processes, reducing salivary contamination because of easy application and fewer moisture sensibility. In the literature, conventional acid-etching and self-etching techniques are compared with regard to shear bond strength, adhesive remnant index scores, mean bonding time and survival period on teeth. Apart from these, studies about the effects of salivary contamination on the bond strength exist

Keywords

Bond strength self-etch adhesive conventional acid-etch

References

  • Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acyrilic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34:849-53.
  • Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: Progress report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1965; 51:901-12.
  • Püşman E. Farklı Mikroadeziv ve Retantif Preparasyon Tekniklerinin Termal Ajitasyona Uğratılmış Travmatize Ön Diş Kırıklarında İmpakt Kuvvetlerine Dayanımının İn Vitro Koşullarda İncelenmesi. HÜ Diş Hek Fak Sağlık Bil Enst, Ankara, 2009.
  • Kramer PF, Zelante F, Simionato MR. The immediate and long-term effects of invasive and noninvasive pit and fissure sealing techniques on the microflora in occlusal fissures of human teeth. Pediatr Dent 1993; 15:108-12.
  • Øgaard B, Rolla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization : Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 94:68-73.
  • Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 1982; 81:93-8.
  • Eliades T. Orthodontic materials research and applications: part 1.Current status and projected future developments in bonding and adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130:445- 51.
  • Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS. Study of orthodontic procedures. Part 1. Results and trends. J Clin Orthod 2008;32:625-41. and treatment
  • Swartz ML. Why prophy prior to bracket bonding?. Clin Impressions 1994;3-11.
  • Gürbüz T, Yılmaz Y, Güler Ç. Kendinden pürüzlendiren farklılıklarının değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg 2007; 17:19-28. bağlayıcının uygulama etkisinin üzerine
  • Burgess AM, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ. Self-etching primers: is prophylactic pumicing necessary? A randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod 2006; 76:114-8.
  • Lill DJ, Lindauer SJ, Tüfekçi E, Shroff B. Importance of pumice prophylaxis for bonding with self-etch primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133:423-6.
  • Lopez JI. Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases. Am J Orthod 1980; 77:669-78.
  • Buonocore MG. Principles of Adhesive Retention and Adhesive Restorative Materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1963; 67:382-91.
  • Keizer CJ, Arends J. Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod 1976; 69:318-27.
  • Bowen RL, Rodrıguez MS. Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of tooth structure and several restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1962; 64:378-87.
  • Retief DH. Failure at the dental adhesive-etched enamel interface. J Oral Rehabil 1974; 1:265-84.
  • Aljubouri YD, Millett DT, Gilmour WH. Laboratory evaluation of a self-etching primer for orthodontic bonding. Eur J Orthod 2003; 25:411-5.
  • Aljubouri YD, Millett DT, Gilmour WH. Six and 12 months' evaluation of a self-etching primer versus two-stage etch and prime for orthodontic bonding: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 2004; 26:565-71.
  • Baka Z, Akın M, İleri Z, Başçiftçi F. Güncel self-etch ve total-etch adeziv sistemlerinin dentin yüzeyinde ortodontik braketlere bağlanma dayanımlarının karşılaştırılması. SÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2011; 20:145-51.
  • Mansour AY, Drummond JL, Evans CA, Bakhsh Z. In vitro evaluation of self-etch bonding in orthodontics using cyclic fatigue. Angle Orthod 2011; 81:783-7.
  • Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Comparison of shear bond strength of two self- etch primer/adhesive systems. Angle Orthod 2006; 76:123-6.
  • Bishara SE, Oonsombat C, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF. Comparison of the shear bond strength of 2 self- etch primer/adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125:348-50.
  • Elekdag-Turk S, Isci D, Turk T, Cakmak F. Six- month bracket failure rate evaluation of a self- etching primer. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30:211-6.
  • Murfitt PG, Quick AN, Swain MV, Herbison GP. A randomised clinical trial to investigate bond failure rates using a self-etching primer. Eur J Orthod 2006; 28:444-9.
  • Reis A,dos Santos JE, Loguercio AD, de Oliveira Bauer JR. Eighteen-month bracket survival rate: conventional versus self-etch adhesive. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30:94-9.
  • Zaher AR, Abdalla EM, Abdel Motie MA, Rehman NA, Kassem H, Athanasiou AE. Enamel colour changes after debonding using various bonding systems. J Orthod 2012; 39:82-8.
  • Eryılmaz K. Self-etching primer kullanılarak yapıştırılan lingual braketlerin tutuculuğu üzerinde tükürük kontaminasyonu ve primere ışık uygulama işleminin etkilerinin in vitro olarak araştırılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hek Fak Sağlık Bil Enst Ankara, 2009.
  • Bishara SE, Oonsombat C, Ajlouni R, Denehy G. The effect of saliva contamination on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets when using a self- etch primer. Angle Orthod 2002; 72:554-7.
  • Larmour CJ, Stirrups DR. An ex vivo assessment of a bonding technique using a self-etching primer. J Orthod 2003; 30:225-8.
  • Maia SR, Cavalli V, Liporoni PC, do Rego MA. Influence of saliva contamination on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138:79-83.

ORTODONTİK BONDİNG İŞLEMİNDE SELF-ETCH PRİMER VE KONVANSİYONEL ASİT-ETCH TEKNİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Year 2014, Volume: 24 Issue: 3, 452 - 457, 11.02.2015

Ezgi Atik Semra Ciğer

https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.88039
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Son zamanlarda ortodontik ataşmanları yapıştırmak için, dişi koruyan ve zaman kazandıran adeziv metodlar geleneksel yöntemlerle yer değiştirmeye başlamıştır. Böylece bonding prosedürleri geliştikçe, self-etching primerler tanıtılmıştır. Self-etching primerlerin avantajları; asitleme ve yıkama işlemlerini içermediğinden kısalan uygulama zamanı, kolay uygulanması nedeniyle tükrük kontaminasyonu olasılığını azaltması ve nem hassasiyetinin az olmasıdır. Literatürde konvansiyonel asit-etch ile self-etch teknikleri;  bağlanma dayanıklılığı, adeziv remnant indeks skorları, ortalama bonding süresi, diş yüzeyinde kalma süresi bakımından karşılaştırılmıştır. Bunların dışında tükrük kontaminasyonun bond dayanıklılığı üzerindeki etkileriyle de ilgili çalışmalar bulunmaktadır.


Keywords

Bond dayanıklılığı selfetch adeziv konvansiyonel asit-etch

References

  • Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acyrilic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34:849-53.
  • Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: Progress report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1965; 51:901-12.
  • Püşman E. Farklı Mikroadeziv ve Retantif Preparasyon Tekniklerinin Termal Ajitasyona Uğratılmış Travmatize Ön Diş Kırıklarında İmpakt Kuvvetlerine Dayanımının İn Vitro Koşullarda İncelenmesi. HÜ Diş Hek Fak Sağlık Bil Enst, Ankara, 2009.
  • Kramer PF, Zelante F, Simionato MR. The immediate and long-term effects of invasive and noninvasive pit and fissure sealing techniques on the microflora in occlusal fissures of human teeth. Pediatr Dent 1993; 15:108-12.
  • Øgaard B, Rolla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization : Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 94:68-73.
  • Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 1982; 81:93-8.
  • Eliades T. Orthodontic materials research and applications: part 1.Current status and projected future developments in bonding and adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130:445- 51.
  • Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS. Study of orthodontic procedures. Part 1. Results and trends. J Clin Orthod 2008;32:625-41. and treatment
  • Swartz ML. Why prophy prior to bracket bonding?. Clin Impressions 1994;3-11.
  • Gürbüz T, Yılmaz Y, Güler Ç. Kendinden pürüzlendiren farklılıklarının değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg 2007; 17:19-28. bağlayıcının uygulama etkisinin üzerine
  • Burgess AM, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ. Self-etching primers: is prophylactic pumicing necessary? A randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod 2006; 76:114-8.
  • Lill DJ, Lindauer SJ, Tüfekçi E, Shroff B. Importance of pumice prophylaxis for bonding with self-etch primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133:423-6.
  • Lopez JI. Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases. Am J Orthod 1980; 77:669-78.
  • Buonocore MG. Principles of Adhesive Retention and Adhesive Restorative Materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1963; 67:382-91.
  • Keizer CJ, Arends J. Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod 1976; 69:318-27.
  • Bowen RL, Rodrıguez MS. Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of tooth structure and several restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1962; 64:378-87.
  • Retief DH. Failure at the dental adhesive-etched enamel interface. J Oral Rehabil 1974; 1:265-84.
  • Aljubouri YD, Millett DT, Gilmour WH. Laboratory evaluation of a self-etching primer for orthodontic bonding. Eur J Orthod 2003; 25:411-5.
  • Aljubouri YD, Millett DT, Gilmour WH. Six and 12 months' evaluation of a self-etching primer versus two-stage etch and prime for orthodontic bonding: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 2004; 26:565-71.
  • Baka Z, Akın M, İleri Z, Başçiftçi F. Güncel self-etch ve total-etch adeziv sistemlerinin dentin yüzeyinde ortodontik braketlere bağlanma dayanımlarının karşılaştırılması. SÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2011; 20:145-51.
  • Mansour AY, Drummond JL, Evans CA, Bakhsh Z. In vitro evaluation of self-etch bonding in orthodontics using cyclic fatigue. Angle Orthod 2011; 81:783-7.
  • Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Comparison of shear bond strength of two self- etch primer/adhesive systems. Angle Orthod 2006; 76:123-6.
  • Bishara SE, Oonsombat C, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF. Comparison of the shear bond strength of 2 self- etch primer/adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125:348-50.
  • Elekdag-Turk S, Isci D, Turk T, Cakmak F. Six- month bracket failure rate evaluation of a self- etching primer. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30:211-6.
  • Murfitt PG, Quick AN, Swain MV, Herbison GP. A randomised clinical trial to investigate bond failure rates using a self-etching primer. Eur J Orthod 2006; 28:444-9.
  • Reis A,dos Santos JE, Loguercio AD, de Oliveira Bauer JR. Eighteen-month bracket survival rate: conventional versus self-etch adhesive. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30:94-9.
  • Zaher AR, Abdalla EM, Abdel Motie MA, Rehman NA, Kassem H, Athanasiou AE. Enamel colour changes after debonding using various bonding systems. J Orthod 2012; 39:82-8.
  • Eryılmaz K. Self-etching primer kullanılarak yapıştırılan lingual braketlerin tutuculuğu üzerinde tükürük kontaminasyonu ve primere ışık uygulama işleminin etkilerinin in vitro olarak araştırılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hek Fak Sağlık Bil Enst Ankara, 2009.
  • Bishara SE, Oonsombat C, Ajlouni R, Denehy G. The effect of saliva contamination on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets when using a self- etch primer. Angle Orthod 2002; 72:554-7.
  • Larmour CJ, Stirrups DR. An ex vivo assessment of a bonding technique using a self-etching primer. J Orthod 2003; 30:225-8.
  • Maia SR, Cavalli V, Liporoni PC, do Rego MA. Influence of saliva contamination on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138:79-83.
There are 31 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Dentistry
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ezgi Atik

Semra Ciğer This is me

Publication Date February 11, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 24 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Atik, E., & Ciğer, S. (2015). ORTODONTİK BONDİNG İŞLEMİNDE SELF-ETCH PRİMER VE KONVANSİYONEL ASİT-ETCH TEKNİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(3), 452-457. https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.88039
AMA Atik E, Ciğer S. ORTODONTİK BONDİNG İŞLEMİNDE SELF-ETCH PRİMER VE KONVANSİYONEL ASİT-ETCH TEKNİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. February 2015;24(3):452-457. doi:10.17567/dfd.88039
Chicago Atik, Ezgi, and Semra Ciğer. “ORTODONTİK BONDİNG İŞLEMİNDE SELF-ETCH PRİMER VE KONVANSİYONEL ASİT-ETCH TEKNİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 24, no. 3 (February 2015): 452-57. https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.88039.
EndNote Atik E, Ciğer S (February 1, 2015) ORTODONTİK BONDİNG İŞLEMİNDE SELF-ETCH PRİMER VE KONVANSİYONEL ASİT-ETCH TEKNİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 24 3 452–457.
IEEE E. Atik and S. Ciğer, “ORTODONTİK BONDİNG İŞLEMİNDE SELF-ETCH PRİMER VE KONVANSİYONEL ASİT-ETCH TEKNİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”, Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 452–457, 2015, doi: 10.17567/dfd.88039.
ISNAD Atik, Ezgi - Ciğer, Semra. “ORTODONTİK BONDİNG İŞLEMİNDE SELF-ETCH PRİMER VE KONVANSİYONEL ASİT-ETCH TEKNİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 24/3 (February 2015), 452-457. https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.88039.
JAMA Atik E, Ciğer S. ORTODONTİK BONDİNG İŞLEMİNDE SELF-ETCH PRİMER VE KONVANSİYONEL ASİT-ETCH TEKNİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2015;24:452–457.
MLA Atik, Ezgi and Semra Ciğer. “ORTODONTİK BONDİNG İŞLEMİNDE SELF-ETCH PRİMER VE KONVANSİYONEL ASİT-ETCH TEKNİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 24, no. 3, 2015, pp. 452-7, doi:10.17567/dfd.88039.
Vancouver Atik E, Ciğer S. ORTODONTİK BONDİNG İŞLEMİNDE SELF-ETCH PRİMER VE KONVANSİYONEL ASİT-ETCH TEKNİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2015;24(3):452-7.

Cited By

Aktif Ortodontik Tedavi Gören Hastalarda COVID-19 Salgını Süresinde Braketin Dişten Ayrılması ve Oral Hijyen Durumu
Journal of Biotechnology and Strategic Health Research
https://doi.org/10.34084/bshr.796304
 Download Cover Image

Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır. Tıklayınız.